Kephale (kef-al-ay’) is found in the New Testament about seventy-five times depending on your translation. It is mostly translated “head”. It sometimes appears as “chief” as in the expression “chief corner stone.” (Matthew 21:42, Mark 12:10) Kephale has both a literal and metaphorical meaning. The literal meaning is “anatomical head”. The literal meaning is by far the primary usage. For instance, fifty-six out of seventy-five occurrences refer to an anatomical head (either human or animal) in the NASB.
The metaphorical meaning is where things get interesting. In recent decades, the metaphorical meaning has received a lot of attention and debate. There are two main opposing views regarding its meaning: complementarianism and egalitarianism.
Generally speaking, complementarians would say that kephale has the metaphorical meaning of “authority over”, “ruler”, “leader”, or “chief”. Seeing that Ephesians 5:23 says “the husband is the head (kephale) of the wife”, the context of that verse together with other relevant verses is believed to show that husbands have God given authority to lead in marriage. This has also been the longstanding understanding within the church. Since the seventies and eighties, egalitarians have promulgated a different metaphorical meaning. They espouse the view that kephale has the metaphorical meaning of “source” and not authority or leader. There are also other suggestions that have been put forth like prominence and preeminence. These different positions also acknowledge a head/body metaphor picture.
Resources and Suggestions for Studying kephale
Which view about the metaphorical meaning of head/kephale is correct? While it is not at all the only important thing about passages like Ephesians 5:21-33, it does deserve careful study. Below are some suggestions to help study this out both biblically and with other resources. The Bible is and always will be the first and final say, but we can benefit from looking at other material as well. Amongst other things, it can help us fact check things we might hear or read on the topic.
Below you will find articles written from complementarian and egalitarian viewpoints. Some are well-known and important in the debate. I’ve included articles from different viewpoints because any study for truth should look at all sides. Also, I believe in going to the source directly instead of just reading someone’s take on the opposing view. We do not need to be afraid to do this kind of work. With prayerful and honest study and God’s help, we can see truth and error. In the process, we might confirm that what we believe is biblically correct or find that we need to change what we believe to line up with God’s word. I believe that confirming or arriving at the truth is worth the time, effort, and possible uncomfortableness of testing beliefs.
As always I caution, pray for discernment. Read carefully. Not all arguments are convincing or correct. In order for one view or the other to be correct, there must be a factual, logical, reasonable, and biblical argument. Since the two viewpoints, complementarianism and egalitarianism, contradict each other, one must be in error. It can be seen with God’s help and prayerful, diligent work.
When we study viewpoints that oppose each other, even if we already hold a certain position, it is wise to ask the Lord to open our eyes to truth and any prejudice we might have. It does not serve us well to simply try to come back to the place we think is right. The end goal is walking in God’s truth.
A Good Bible translation
Keep a good, accurate Bible like a NASB, ESV, or KJV by your side throughout the study. Practice good biblical exegesis. Read verses in context and read other verses that might relate to the topic. The following list serves as a starting point. Other verses may come into play too depending on what aspects you are studying. The belief that a husband’s role includes the element of authority or the belief that he is the source of his wife is not limited to one word in one or two verses. It is best to take all relevant scriptures together.
Main verses to consider:
“But I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ.” (1 Corinthians 11:3)
“For the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ also is the head of the church, He Himself being the Savior of the body.” (Ephesians 5:23)
1 Corinthians 11:1-16
Ephesians 5:21 – 33
Christ as head
Ephesians 1:19b-23, Ephesians 4:14-16, Colossians 1:15-18, Colossians 2:9-10, and Colossians 2:18-19
Submission in marriage
Colossians 3:18, Titus 2:5, and 1 Peter 3:1-2
There are many commentaries available for us to review. Some have been around for a long time and some are modern. I like to read older ones and trace ideas through the centuries. If you do not have any in your home, there are many online or in Bible software and apps. If possible, learn about the background of the author(s) and bear it in mind.
To get you started:
Verse-by-Verse Bible Commentary: 1 Corinthians 11:3 (Entries from 32 different commentaries)
Dates: 1500s – 2000s [StudyLight.org]
- “Authority“ or a similar meaning or conveyed idea for “head” occurs in 22 entries. (This includes entries that demonstrate the meaning through the concept of subjection of the woman/wife.)
- One commentary (Peter Pett’s Commentary on the Bible, 2013) advocates for lordship and life source.
- One commentary (Expository Notes of Dr. Thomas Constable, 2012) mentions origin (source) and authority (leader). It is stated that: “Both meanings are true to reality, so it is difficult to decide what Paul meant here.” The entry ends with: “…origin may be the preferable idea here too.”
- No entries give “source” emphatically and solely
- Other entries do not state a meaning, are duplicates, or give only an implication of the meaning.
Verse-by-Verse Bible Commentary: Ephesians 5:23 (Entries from 30 different commentaries)
Dates: 1500s – 2000s [StudyLight.org]
- “Authority“ or a similar meaning or conveyed idea for “head” occurs in 14 entries. (This includes entries that demonstrate the meaning through the concept of subjection of the wife.)
- No entries give “source”.
- Fourteen entries do not state a meaning.
- One duplicate and one implied meaning.
Greek dictionaries and Lexicons
Definition: (a) the head, (b) met: a corner stone, uniting two walls; head, ruler, lord.
NASB Exhaustive Concordance
Definition: the head
Definition: 1) the head
2) metaphorically anything supreme, chief, prominent
2a) of persons, master lord: of a husband in relation to his wife
2b) of Christ: the Lord of the husband and of the Church
2c) of things: the corner stone
Below is information from seven Greek Lexicons regarding kephale.
The above selection of lexicons lists six that give meanings akin to rank, authority, or leader. One, the Liddell-Scott, gives “source” (when in the plural) as a sub meaning under the second category: Of things, extremity. This entry in the Liddell-Scott has been central to the egalitarian argument for decades, though it is not as supportive as may appear. For an analysis, please see the link below to “Does Kephalē (“Head”) Mean ‘Source’ Or ‘Authority Over’ in Greek Literature? A Survey of 2,336 Examples” by Dr. Grudem. [p.44]
Critical information about the Liddell-Scott entry also appears in Dr. Grudem’s article “The meaning of κεφαλή (“head”): An evaluation of new evidence, real and alleged”. (See link below.) I will share part of that information here. On pages 39 – 41, Dr. Grudem writes about the results of a correspondence he had with the then editor of the Liddell-Scott, Mr. Peter Glare, regarding kephale back in 1997. Dr. Grudem had sent Mr. Glare a copy of his 1990 Trinity Journal article “The Meaning of kephale: A Response to Recent Studies” that defended the metaphorical meaning of “authority over” for kephale. (See link below.) Mr. Glare reviewed the article and responded expressing “broad agreement” with Dr. Grudem. Mr. Glare gave credence to “authority” and took issue with “source” saying: “The supposed sense ‘source’ of course does not exist and it was at least unwise of Liddell and Scott to mention the word.”
This expert’s comments essentially corrected the entry and weakened the argument for “source” from the Liddell-Scott. By extension, it weakened the egalitarian argument because they rely heavily on it. Please see the article to read the whole letter. It is critical to the question at hand. Also, please make note of it as you study this out. I still see the Liddell-Scott referenced as a big reason for espousing “source” for kephale, and you might too. Referrers are either unaware of or unmoved by Mr. Glare’s important contribution to the discussion.
Complementarian and Egalitarian Sources
Below is a list of online resources to get you started in a deeper study of head/kephale. There are modern day articles about the metaphorical meaning for kephale by complementarians and egalitarians. Some of the sources below reference each other. Cross check whenever possible. It is very interesting to read one and then other. If you look online, you will find even more articles. For further study, there are also books that cover this topic and other topics relating to roles and gender; but online articles are free and easily available.
Advocates for “beginning”
1954. Stephen Bedale. “The Meaning of Kephale in the Pauline Epistles.” Journal of Theological Studies (October 1954): pp 211-215. [Mr. Bedale mentions “source” too, but does not completely take “authority” out of kephale or unique submission from wives.]
Advocates for “source”
1971. F.F.Bruce. “1 and 2 Corinthians.” Oliphant, London (1971): Page 103.
1981. Berkeley and Alvera Mickelsen. “The Head of the Epistles.” Christianity Today (February 1981) [God’s Word to Women, godswordtowomen.org]
1993. Catherine Kroeger. “Head.” Dictionary of Paul and his letters IVP (1993)
Unknown. Laurie Fasullo. “What about the word Kephale (“head”) in the New Testament?.” [Searching Together, searchingtogether.org]
2011. Margaret Mowczko. “Kephalē and ‘Male Headship’ in Paul’s Letters The Metaphorical Meanings of ‘Head’ in Paul’s Letters: Part One.” [New Life, newlife.id.au]
2012. Stephanie, aka. creativehomeschooler. “Does ‘Head’ Mean Authority?” [A Profound Mystery, aprofoundmysterydotcom.wordpress.com]
2015. Pat Joyce. “Exploring the Greek Word Kephale Translated ‘Head‘. [Ishshah’s Story, ishshahsstory.com]
General Resources: Christians for Biblical Equality
Advocates for “authority”or similar meaning
The first date of 1985 below does not mean that this was the beginning of the belief within the church that head/kephale had the metaphorical meaning of authority. It is just a reflection of the order of the modern day debate. As mentioned above, it has been a longstanding understanding within the church that husbands have God given authority to lead in marriage. Church history has many examples of statements that demonstrate the idea that being the “head” of his wife indicates authority for a husband. A search of early and later church writings will demonstrate this. For a look at some examples from the 1500s – 2000s, please see the Commentaries section above for links that lead to commentaries from that time period. The verses they examine are 1 Corinthians 11:3 and Ephesians 5:23.
1985. Wayne Grudem. “Does kephalē (“head”) Mean ‘Source’ or ‘Authority Over’ in Greek Literature? A Survey of 2,336 Examples,” Trinity Journal 6 NS (Spring 1985), 38-59
1989. Joseph A. Fitzmyer, S. J. “Another Look at Kephale in 1 Corinthians 11.3.” New Testament Studies4 (1989): pp 503-511.
1990. Wayne Grudem. “The Meaning of kephalē (“Head”): A Response to Recent Studies,” Trinity Journal 11NS (Spring, 1990), 3-72. [reprinted in Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism, edited by John Piper and Wayne Grudem (Wheaton: Crossway, 1991), 425-68.]
To read this article, please see Appendix One of Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism. It begins at page 425
1993. Joseph A. Fitzmyer, S. J. “Kephale in 1 Corinthians 11:3.” Interpretation 47, pp 52-59
Unkown. Matt Slick. “1 Cor. 11:3, the word ‘head’ does not mean authority.” [Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry, carm.org]
1999. Pat Campbell. “Husbands, Wives, Headship, and Submission.” [Baptist2Baptist, SBCLife Articles, baptist2baptist.net]
2001. Wayne Grudem. “The Meaning of kephalē, (“head”): An Evaluation of New Evidence, Real and Alleged,” JETS 44/1 (March, 2001), 25-65.
2011. Jonathan Burke. “Does ‘kephalē’ mean ‘source?” [Christian Studies, christianstudies.wordpress.com]
2015. Wayne Grudem. “The meanings of kephalē (“head”) and hypotassō (“submit to”): After 30 years of controversy, where are we?” [Wayne Grudem, waynegrudem.com]
General Resources: Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood
Advocates for Source and Preeminence
1989. Richard S. Cervin. “Does Kephale mean ‘source’ or ‘authority over’ in Greek literature? A rebuttal.” Trinity Journal 10 NS. 85-112. (Partial)
Advocates primarily for Topness (also Prominence and Preeminence)
2016. Richard S. Cervin. “On the Significance of Kephalē (“Head”) A Study of the Abuse of One Greek Word.” Priscilla Papers (2016): 8-20. [The Junia Project, juniaproject.com]
Histories of the debate
2006. Jack Cottrell. “Kephale Wars: Does Kephale (head) mean source or leader? A Case Study In Feminist Methodology and Scholarship.” CBS 2006 [web download]
2009. Alan F. Johnson. “A review of the scholarly debate on the meaning of ‘head’ (kephale) in Paul’s writings.” Ashland Theological Journal (2009) [Women in the church, womeninthechurch.co.uk]
“The sum of Your word is truth, And every one of Your righteous ordinances is everlasting.”